🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a direct response from the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."